Subject: Polity
Several factors can trigger judicial activism, including widespread social injustices, gaps in legislative frameworks, and instances of executive overreach. When public grievances remain unaddressed and conventional legal remedies prove inadequate, citizens often resort to filing petitions that prompt courts to step in.
For example, public interest litigations on issues such as environmental degradation and the right to education have frequently catalyzed judicial interventions. Media coverage and public outcry over such issues further compel the judiciary to take a proactive stance. These activators ensure that the courts remain a viable forum for redressing systemic failures and protecting the rights of vulnerable populations.
In essence, the confluence of social demand, legal necessity, and public accountability serves as a powerful impetus for judicial activism.