Apprehensions of Judicial Activism

Despite its benefits, judicial activism raises concerns about the potential for judicial overreach. Critics argue that an activist judiciary might encroach on the domains of the legislature and executive, thereby upsetting the separation of powers that is fundamental to democratic governance.

There are fears that when courts substitute their own interpretations for those of elected representatives, it could lead to a dilution of democratic accountability. For instance, controversial judgments on issues like reservation policies or economic reforms have sparked debates over whether the judiciary is overstepping its constitutional role.

These apprehensions underscore the need for a balanced approach, where judicial intervention is measured and respects the limits of constitutional authority, ensuring that the judicial branch does not become a substitute for the political process.