Criticism of the Constituent Assembly

Despite its celebrated legacy, the Constituent Assembly has faced considerable criticism over the years. Detractors argue that it was not fully representative since its members were indirectly elected on a limited franchise, and that it was not entirely sovereign given its origins in British proposals. Critics have also pointed to the prolonged duration of the process, the dominance of the Congress party and legal experts, and claims of overrepresentation of certain communities—all of which some say contributed to the complex language of the Constitution.

• Accused of limited representativeness and indirect election.
• Questioned for not being a fully sovereign body.
• Criticized for its extended timeline and dominant party influence.
• Claims of imbalance in community representation have also been voiced.