Topic Details (Notes format)

Definition of State Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights

Subject: Polity

Description

Definition of State Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights

Under the doctrine of constitutional supremacy, any state law that conflicts with the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution is deemed void to the extent of the inconsistency. This ensures that all legislative and executive actions remain subordinate to the core principles of justice and individual freedom.

Judicial review is the mechanism through which the courts scrutinize state laws, striking down any provisions that infringe upon the inalienable rights of citizens. This principle not only reinforces the primacy of the Constitution but also acts as a bulwark against arbitrary state power.

Summary

Explains that any state law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights is invalid, ensuring constitutional supremacy and protecting individual freedoms.