Subject: Polity
Judges appointed to the Supreme Court must be citizens of India with extensive experience in the field of law – either as judges or as legal practitioners – typically requiring at least ten years of experience. Their qualifications are rigorously scrutinized to ensure that only individuals of exemplary legal proficiency and impeccable ethical standing ascend to this prestigious forum. Upon appointment, every judge is required to take a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution, administer justice impartially, and protect the fundamental rights of citizens. This oath is traditionally administered by the Chief Justice of India or, if unavailable, by the senior-most judge present, which reinforces the ceremonial as well as the binding nature of this commitment.
In addition to these stringent qualifications, their remuneration is determined by Parliament to ensure financial security and independence from external pressures. The salary, allowances, and pensions provided are periodically reviewed to match the responsibilities of the office and to ensure that judicial remuneration remains insulated from political influence. Recent debates in the media have highlighted the importance of such financial safeguards in maintaining judicial independence, particularly in the context of ongoing discussions about remuneration and benefits in the public sector.
Factual aspects include the legal requirements for eligibility, the formal oath as prescribed by constitutional and statutory provisions, and the mechanisms for salary determination which are integral for protecting the integrity of the judiciary.