Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

Who was the first woman Speaker of the Lok Sabha?

Which of the following is a Fundamental Duty under the Indian Constitution?

संविधान सभा की अंतिम बैठक किस वर्ष हुई थी?

Who has the authority to dissolve the Lok Sabha?

संसद सदस्यों का वेतन और भत्ता किस अनुच्छेद में निर्धारित है?

Which is the largest state in India by area?

मौलिक अधिकारों के उल्लंघन पर तत्काल न्यायिक राहत किस अनुच्छेद में दी जाती है?

Who is responsible for the selection of the judges of the Supreme Court?

Which of the following is the longest-serving political party in India?

कार्यपालिका के प्रमुख की नियुक्ति में किसका निर्णय अंतिम होता है?