Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

Who has the authority to dissolve the Rajya Sabha?

What is the term of office for the President of India?

Who has the power to remove a Governor from office in India?

संसद कार्यवाही की समय सीमा किस अनुच्छेद में उल्लिखित है?

नागरिकता की अवधारणा किस अनुच्छेद से शुरू होती है?

Which article of the Indian Constitution provides for the protection of rights of minorities?

What is the term of office for a Governor of a state in India?

राज्य के अधिकारों की सीमा किसके द्वारा निर्धारित की जाती है?

मौलिक अधिकारों की सुरक्षा के लिए नागरिकों को कौन सा अधिकार प्रदान किया गया है?

Which of the following is the highest court of appeal in India?