Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

Which of the following is the longest serving Chief Minister in India?

View Question

संसदीय प्रश्न सत्र के दौरान प्रश्नों के उत्तर कौन देता है?

View Question

Which of the following is a provision related to the financial powers of the Parliament?

View Question

Which article of the Indian Constitution deals with the official language of the Union?

View Question

Who can remove the President of India from office?

View Question

न्यायपालिका की संरचना में किसका प्रमुख योगदान होता है?

View Question

न्यायपालिका के निर्णयों की binding प्रभावशीलता किस पर आधारित है?

View Question

Who is the first citizen of India?

View Question

What is the maximum number of members in the Legislative Council of a state?

View Question

Who among the following is the ex-officio Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of India?

View Question