Topic Details (Notes format)

Concurrent Powers and Doctrine of Repugnancy

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

When Parliament and a state legislature pass conflicting laws on concurrent list subjects, central law prevails (Article 254) unless the state law obtains presidential assent. This “doctrine of repugnancy” prevents overlapping statutes from causing confusion. Courts analyze whether an actual conflict exists or if both laws can coexist. If repugnancy is found, the union law or the latter law with presidential assent supersedes. This ensures legislative harmony and respects the Constitution’s hierarchy. States, though free to adapt central frameworks for local conditions, must avoid direct contradiction. Mastery of this principle explains how India’s concurrency fosters unity without stifling state innovation.

Practice Questions

संविधान संशोधन की प्रक्रिया किस अनुच्छेद द्वारा नियंत्रित होती है?

उच्च न्यायालयों का गठन किस आधार पर किया जाता है?

कार्यपालिका के प्रमुख के रूप में किसे नियुक्त किया जाता है?

What is the maximum strength of the Legislative Assembly of a state?

Which article of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty?

Who is the guardian of the Indian Constitution?

राष्ट्रपति के लिए योग्यता मानदंड किस अनुच्छेद में वर्णित हैं?

Which of the following is a provision related to the financial powers of the Parliament?

Who is the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha?

राष्ट्रपति द्वारा दी जाने वाली शपथ किस अनुच्छेद में प्रावधिक है?