Topic Details (Notes format)

Constitutional Position of Judiciary vs. Executive

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Though the executive enforces laws, the judiciary interprets them. Judges are appointed with executive involvement but serve independently, enjoying security of tenure. The President issues judicial appointments, yet the collegium recommends candidates. Conflict arises if the executive perceives judicial activism as encroachment. Landmark cases (NJAC verdict) reaffirmed judicial primacy in appointments. Meanwhile, the judiciary defers to executive discretion in policy unless rights are infringed. This delicate balance ensures no single organ dominates. Maintaining mutual respect, clear separation of roles, and transparency is vital for stable governance. Students must track this dynamic interplay shaping India’s constitutional ecosystem.

Practice Questions

Who appoints the members of the Finance Commission of India?

View Question

न्यायिक समीक्षा मुख्यतः किन के खिलाफ की जाती है?

View Question

What is the minimum age for a person to become the Chief Minister of a state in India?

View Question

Who was the first woman to become the President of India?

View Question

प्रधानमंत्री का कार्यकाल कितने वर्षों का होता है?

View Question

वरिष्ठ न्यायाधीशों के चयन में किस समिति का योगदान होता है?

View Question

Who is considered the "father of the Indian Constitution"?

View Question

राज्य के अधिकारों की सीमा किसके द्वारा निर्धारित की जाती है?

View Question

Who is the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha?

View Question

Which of the following is a feature of the Indian Constitution?

View Question