Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Characterized by proactive judgments where courts step in to fill legislative or executive voids. Often exercised through Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that broadens access to justice for marginalized communities. Critics argue that excessive activism blurs the separation of powers. However, advocates see it as necessary when governance fails, citing cases like Vishakha (1997) on workplace harassment guidelines and environment protection mandates. Judicial activism can reshape socio-political landscapes, as judges interpret fundamental rights in progressive ways. Balancing activism and judicial restraint remains a constant debate, hinging on whether courts are overreaching or rightfully safeguarding constitutional morality.

Practice Questions

संविधान संशोधन के प्रस्ताव किसके द्वारा प्रस्तुत किए जाते हैं?

View Question

Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Indian federal system?

View Question

भारतीय संविधान में मौलिक कर्तव्यों का प्रावधान किस अनुच्छेद में है?

View Question

संसद कार्यवाही की समय सीमा किस अनुच्छेद में उल्लिखित है?

View Question

केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों के बीच शक्तियों का विभाजन किस अनुच्छेद में निर्धारित है?

View Question

Who is the head of the government in India?

View Question

न्यायपालिका की स्वतंत्रता किस अनुच्छेद में सुनिश्चित की गई है?

View Question

विधान सभा सदस्यों के विवाद समाधान की प्रक्रिया किस अनुच्छेद में है?

View Question

Which of the following is a provision related to the financial powers of the Parliament?

View Question

राज्यों के बीच शक्तियों का संतुलन किस सिद्धांत पर आधारित है?

View Question