Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

Who is the first woman President of India?

View Question

कार्यपालिका के प्रमुख की नियुक्ति में किसका निर्णय अंतिम होता है?

View Question

Who is the head of the government in India?

View Question

मौलिक अधिकारों के लिए न्यायिक संरक्षण किस अनुच्छेद के माध्यम से मिलता है?

View Question

Who is responsible for the appointment of the members of the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)?

View Question

Which article of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty?

View Question

राष्ट्रपति के आदेशों को निरस्त करने का अधिकार किसके पास है?

View Question

What is the term of office for the President of India?

View Question

Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?

View Question

What is the minimum age for a person to contest elections for the Lok Sabha?

View Question