Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

Which of the following is NOT a power of the President of India?

View Question

न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति में किस समिति की सिफारिश ली जाती है?

View Question

विधान सभा अध्यक्ष की योग्यता किस आधार पर निर्धारित होती है?

View Question

नागरिकता की अवधारणा किस अनुच्छेद से शुरू होती है?

View Question

न्यायपालिका की संरचना में किसका प्रमुख योगदान होता है?

View Question

Who was the first woman to become the President of India?

View Question

वरिष्ठ न्यायाधीशों की नियुक्ति में किस समिति का योगदान होता है?

View Question

Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Indian Constitution?

View Question

Which of the following is a provision of the Indian Constitution regarding the Emergency?

View Question

What is the procedure for impeachment of the President of India?

View Question