Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

Who has the power to remove a Governor from office in India?

View Question

विधान सभा सदस्यों के विवाद समाधान की प्रक्रिया किस अनुच्छेद में है?

View Question

राज्यसभा की कार्यप्रणाली किस पर आधारित है?

View Question

Which is the largest state in India by area?

View Question

संविधान सभा की अंतिम बैठक किस वर्ष हुई थी?

View Question

Which of the following is a Directive Principle of State Policy in India?

View Question

Who has the authority to remove the Vice President of India from office?

View Question

Which article of the Indian Constitution allows the President to declare a National Emergency?

View Question

Who can remove the President of India from office?

View Question

संसद में विधेयक पर पुनर्विचार का अधिकार किसे है?

View Question