Subject: Polity
Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth
Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.
संसद सदस्यों का वेतन का निर्धारण किसकी स्वीकृति से होता है?
View QuestionWhat is the minimum age for a person to contest elections for the Lok Sabha?
View QuestionWho appoints the members of the Finance Commission of India?
View Questionभारत का राष्ट्रपति किस प्रक्रिया द्वारा चुना जाता है?
View Questionविधान सभा अध्यक्ष की योग्यता किस आधार पर निर्धारित होती है?
View Questionकार्यपालिका के प्रमुख की नियुक्ति में न्यूनतम अनुभव में निम्नलिखित में से कौन सा आवश्यक नहीं है?
View Questionन्यायपालिका के अधिकार का सबसे महत्वपूर्ण आधार क्या है?
View QuestionWho has the authority to dissolve the Rajya Sabha?
View Questionराष्ट्रपति को हटाने की प्रक्रिया किस अनुच्छेद में प्रावधिक है?
View QuestionWhich of the following is NOT a part of the Indian Parliament?
View Question