Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

What is the procedure for impeachment of the President of India?

View Question

अभियोजक की नियुक्ति किस प्रावधान के तहत होती है?

View Question

Which of the following is NOT a feature of the Indian Constitution?

View Question

वरिष्ठ न्यायाधीशों के चयन में किस समिति का योगदान होता है?

View Question

Which article of the Indian Constitution deals with the official language of the Union?

View Question

आपातकाल की घोषणा के लिए केंद्रीय सरकार को अतिरिक्त शक्तियाँ किस अनुच्छेद द्वारा दी जाती हैं?

View Question

न्यायिक समीक्षा का सिद्धांत किसके द्वारा समर्थित है?

View Question

संघीय ढांचे में केंद्र और राज्य सरकारों के बीच शक्ति का विभाजन किस सिद्धांत पर आधारित है?

View Question

Who is the ex-officio Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission of India?

View Question

Who was the first woman Speaker of the Lok Sabha?

View Question