Topic Details (Notes format)

Judicial Restraint vs. Judicial Activism

Subject: Polity

Book: Indian Polity by M. Laxmikanth

Debates the extent courts should intervene in policy. Judicial restraint advocates minimal interference, respecting the legislature’s and executive’s domain. Judicial activism supports proactive stances to fill legislative gaps or protect rights. While activism has led to progressive decisions on environmental issues, women’s rights, and corruption, excessive activism risks overshadowing elected bodies. Restraint ensures stability and democratic respect. Balancing both is key—courts must uphold constitutional principles yet avoid legislative or policy-making roles. Understanding this spectrum helps contextualize judgments that shape the interplay of law, politics, and social reforms in India’s constitutional democracy.

Practice Questions

राष्ट्रपति के लिए योग्यता मानदंड किस अनुच्छेद में वर्णित हैं?

Which of the following is NOT a part of the Indian Parliament?

मौलिक अधिकारों की सुरक्षा के लिए नागरिकों को कौन सा अधिकार प्रदान किया गया है?

Who among the following was the first woman Speaker of the Lok Sabha?

अभियोजक की स्वतंत्रता किस सिद्धांत पर आधारित है?

Which of the following is a power of the Rajya Sabha?

कार्यपालिका के प्रमुख का चुनाव किसके द्वारा किया जाता है?

Which of the following is a Fundamental Duty under the Indian Constitution?

Who appoints the Chief Election Commissioner of India?

संविधान संशोधन के लिए मतदान कितनी बार किया जाता है?